18/06/14

Client cleared of serious charges at Snaresbrook Crown Court

Kangs Solicitors represented a client charged with 2 counts of historic rape. The allegations healthordisease.com were more than 20 years old. After a trial lasting 13 days at Snaresbrook Crown Court the client was unanimously acquitted by a jury. Hamraj Kang and Frances Murray had conduct of this case.

The client commented:

This has been a very harrowing experience for me and my family. There have been some very dark moments over the last 12 months or so but I have had to stay strong in order to fight these false allegations. I have been helped enormously by my solicitors Hamraj Kang and Frances Murray who have dealt with my matter with patience and great diligence. The support I received from both Frances Murray and my counsel Barry Kogan during the trial was fantastic and I would like to extend a special thank you to them.

Previous Next

Commercial Disputes, Intellectual Property Disputes

Trade Mark Registration in the UK | Benefits, Fees, and How to Avoid Unnecessary Costs

In this short article, we explain how not having your trade mark registered could have a detrimental effect on your ability to win in court should a commercial dispute arise. KANGS regularly acts for parties involved in intellectual property disputes. Given the obvious and significant value in trade marks, and where possible, any business that […]

09/03/26

Tax & HMRC

HMRC Nudge Letters and the ‘Unallowable Purpose’ Rule

An ‘unallowable purpose’ is one which appears to be designed simply to secure a tax advantage for the company, where the purpose does not fall within the company’s normal business or commercial undertakings. The intent of the ‘unallowable purpose’ rule is to control the deductibility of interest for corporation tax calculations in circumstances where the […]

05/03/26

Commercial Disputes, Intellectual Property Disputes

How the Supreme Court Views Trade Mark Similarity | Iconix v Dream Pairs Explained

At KANGS, we support individuals and businesses both in protecting their trade marks and in responding to allegations that their branding is confusingly similar to another’s. In this article we examine a high-profile intellectual property dispute involving trade marks and explain the key implications and lessons for brand owners. In June 2025, the Supreme Court […]

03/03/26

Client cleared of serious charges at Snaresbrook Crown Court

Get in touch

Send an enquiry

Birmingham

London

Manchester