Call us0333 370 4333
17/02/21

Ruling Curtails Section 2 Powers Of The SFO

Share

A recent ruling by the Supreme Court has restricted the powers of the Serious Fraud Office (‘SFO’) under Section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (‘the Act’).

Hamraj Kang provides a brief commentary on the recent decision.

The team at Kangs Solicitors is highly accredited for advising corporate and individual clients in relation to every aspect of SFO investigations.

The team is led by Hamraj Kang who is ranked as a ‘star individual’ for financial crime investigations by the leading legal directory Chambers UK.

For an initial no obligation discussion, please call our VAT Team at any of our offices detailed below:

London
Birmingham
Manchester

The Ruling | KRB v SFO

The SFO is afforded powers under Section 2 of the Act to compel corporate bodies and individuals to attend compulsory interviews and to deliver up documents and electronic material relevant to the investigation.

In KRB v SFO, the SFO sought to use its powers under Section 2(3) of the Act to compel a foreign company to provide documents held outside the UK.

The SFO issued the Section 2 Notice requiring KRB (‘the company’) to provide material held overseas. The company sought to challenge this requirement by way of a Judicial Review arguing that the SFO had exceeded its powers.

The Supreme Court upheld the appeal by the company and ruled that overseas material held by the company need not be handed to the SFO.

The company had never conducted business in the UK and did not have a registered office in the UK. In a previous ruling, the Divisional Court had ruled that the SFO was entitled to seek production of material from a foreign company which was held outside the UK if the company had a sufficient connection to the UK. The Supreme Court ruled that there was no basis for reaching this conclusion.

The Supreme Court found that it could not have been the intention of Parliament, in passing the Act, to bestow power on the SFO enabling it to compel a foreign company to produce documents and electronic material held outside the UK.

The Implications | What Now For The SFO?

Clearly, the Supreme Court ruling has significantly curtailed the investigatory powers of the SFO which will be disappointed with the decision.

Given the number of cases investigated by the SFO involving foreign companies and evidence retained in foreign jurisdictions, this ruling will take some digesting by the SFO.

The decision is likely to have a significant impact on:

  • the way the SFO conducts future extra-territorial investigations, and
  • current ongoing investigations where material held by a foreign company outside the UK has already been delivered to the SFO as a result of a Section 2(3) Notice being served on that foreign company.

Widely regarded as a ‘watershed moment’, this Supreme Court decision will require the SFO to make significant changes to its investigatory techniques.

Foreign companies now have protection afforded by the Supreme Court ruling, being no longer faced with the threat of compulsion to produce such material and the accompanying fear of criminal prosecution for failing to comply.   

In future, when the SFO continues to ‘evidence gather’ in foreign jurisdictions it will have to rely on the traditional ‘mutual legal assistance’ mechanisms in place between countries. The mutual legal assistance approach to evidence gathering will neither be as quick and efficient as a legal requirement to comply with a Section 2(3) Notice nor will it necessarily result in the production of all the material being sought by the SFO.

It is arguable that the Act has lost its efficacy and requires updating given that the number of multi-national investigations conducted by the SFO is now significantly higher that it was when the Act was passed. Any changes would inevitably require an Act of Parliament.

How Can We Assist?

Upon receipt of any form of Section 2 Notice from the SFO, it is advisable to seek immediate specialist advice. 

We appreciate that if a foreign company has already complied with a Section 2(3) Notice and provided material from overseas to the SFO urgent advice will be required. 

The team at Kangs Solicitors is well equipped to assist with all aspects of SFO investigations including representing corporate/individual clients in relation to:

Who Can I Contact? | Kangs Fraud Investigations Lawyers

We welcome new enquiries by telephone or email.

Our team of lawyers is available to meet at our offices in London, Birmingham or Manchester or, alternatively, we are happy to arrange an initial no obligation meeting via telephone or video conferencing.

For initial enquires please contact:

Hamraj Kang

Email Hamraj
07976 258171
020 7936 6396
0121 449 9888

John Veale

Email John
0121 449 9888
020 7936 6396

Tim Thompson

Email Tim
020 7936 6396
0121 449 9888

Cryptocurrency, Serious Fraud, Tax & HMRC
The UK does not have a specific tax regime for crypto assets such as cryptocurrency or tokens. Instead, it applies the standard tax laws. HMRC does not treat cryptocurrency as currency, it is considered a form of property or asset. When part of any form of transaction, cryptocurrency may incur liabilities, primarily related to Income […]
31/03/25
Serious Fraud, Tax & HMRC
HMRC is allowed to deregister a company from VAT where that company has been using its VAT Registration Number for fraudulent purposes. This power derives from the European Court of Justice case of Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v Ablessio SIA C-527/11, (‘the Ablessio principle’). Amongst the various forms of Notice of VAT Assessment which HMRC may […]
10/03/25
Financial Investigations, Tax & HMRC
KANGS has successfully represented a well-established UK based construction company and its director in VAT related proceedings against HMRC before the First-tier Tax Tribunal. Hamraj Kang, senior partner of KANGS provides some background on the case and details the issues addressed by the KANGS Tax Litigation Team to achieve this successful result. KANGS has a […]
20/02/25

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham