Call us 0333 370 4333
03/11/23

The Kittel Principle

The Kittel Principle
Share

In an article previously posted to this website entitled Kittel Principle in HMRC Cases’ we explained in detail the following:

  • ‘The Three Limbs of the Kittel Principle’ and
  • The objective test when deciding whether or not the ‘taxable person knew about fraud in general at the time the transactions in general took place

The European Court of Justice Cases, of Axel Kittel v Belgian State and Belgian State v Recolta Recycling SPRL (C-439/04 and C440/04) (Kittel Case) stated that where a taxpayer knew or should have known that they were participating in a transaction connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT, that taxpayer’s right to deduct input tax should be refused.

HMRC regularly implements the Kittel Principle when seeking to recover unpaid VAT from those suspected of participating in VAT fraud, particularly, at the present time, supply chain VAT fraud committed by subcontractors involved in the building industry.

Although the reverse charge was introduced in the building industry on 1 March 2021, HMRC will still in certain circumstances use the Kittel Principle to make Assessments on historical VAT returns where there has been fraudulent evasion of VAT within the trading chain.

John Veale comments on how the current level of HMRC activity places company directors under ever increasing pressure to ensure that companies for which they are responsible can evidence appropriate levels of due diligence.

Circumstances Which May Alert HMRC

Activity which may lead to an extended verification by HMRC when considering a Repayment VAT Return includes:

  • employment of a previously used but now VAT de-registered subcontractor, one which is not registered for VAT or one which is using another company’s VAT registration number,
  • the engagement of subcontractors over a period of time with a record of VAT Return defaults,
  • requests for the payment of invoices to one or more third parties,
  • concerns as to the standard of due diligence being conducted, such as failure to conduct VAT validity checks.

Consequences for Breach

In the event of default HMRC may:

  • issue VAT Assessments for the amounts of VAT required to be paid,
  • issue Penalty Notices in support of such VAT Assessments,
  • serve the company officers with a Personal Liability Notice,
  • deregister the company for VAT,
  • remove Gross Payment Status,
  • order removal from the CIS system.

Directors Duties

Exercising the Kittel Principle, HMRC seeks to establish whether or not a director has been fraudulent, knew about perpetration of a fraud or should have been aware.

HMRC states: ‘…actual knowledge [of fraud] may be inferred from a range of circumstantial evidence about the way in which the transactions have taken place that the taxable person ‘’must have known’’ that his transactions were connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT’.

As shown above, the consequences for breach are severe and in order to protect both themselves and their companies, directors should be fully aware of their obligations under the Kittel Principle and are well advised to, inter alia ensure that they can demonstrate:

  • their VAT Returns are accurate and honest,
  • all of those within a particular supply chain, in which they participate, deal similarly and provide appropriate and accurate VAT details with regard to all charges etc.,
  • clear policies are in place to identify potential avenues of fraud,
  • such fraud prevention policies are actively exercised.

Who Can I Contact for Advice & Help?

If you, your business, or both, are, or become, subject to any form of investigation by HMRC, including one involving the exercise of the Kittel Principle, it is essential that you seek immediate expert advice as strict time limits may govern your time for submitting a detailed response.

Our experienced Team will be pleased to assist and provide detailed guidance regarding all aspects of HMRC investigations from the outset to Tax Tribunal or potential criminal proceedings.

Please do not hesitate to contact the Team at KANGS using the contact details below and they will be pleased to speak to you:

Tel:       0333 370 4333

Email: info@kangssolicitors.co.uk

We provide initial no obligation discussion at our three offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester. Alternatively, discussions can be held through live conferencing or telephone.

Hamraj Kang

Hamraj Kang
Senior Partner

Email Phone Mobile
John Veale

John Veale
Partner

Email Phone
Tim Thompson

Tim Thompson
Partner

Email Phone

Top ranked by leading legal directories Chambers UK and the Legal 500.

Account Freezing Order, Financial Investigations, Tax & HMRC
In a recent case, the team at KANGS successfully secured the removal of Account Freezing Orders (AFOs) obtained by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) against seven different bank accounts. HMRC obtained the Freezing Orders on the grounds that it suspected the funds held within the accounts were derived from criminal conduct, namely tax evasion, and […]
11/10/24
Financial Investigations, POCA
Can a confiscation order be re-opened after the date it was originally made? We examine the options available to the prosecution and also the steps that can be taken to safeguard the interests of those subject to a confiscation order. The Law Unless the amount found payable under a confiscation order is discharged in full, […]
09/09/24
Financial Investigations, POCA
Nazaqat Maqsoom of KANGS Solicitors outlines the circumstances in which the Slip Rule can be applied and looks at a recent Judgement by the Court of Appeal which considered its application. What is the Slip Rule? The Crown Court, by virtue of Section 155 Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, as amended by section […]
02/09/24

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential.
Old map of Birmingham