NEWS

Kangs Solicitors today start a Murder trial at Leeds Crown Court which is expected to last 6 – 8 weeks. Kangs represent 1 of 7 defendants all charged with Murder and Violent Disorder following an incident in a suburb of Leeds earlier this year. The Crown allege that our client  is the principal offender who […]

A prosecution brought by the CPS against a Kangs’ client and seven other defendants at Teesside Crown Court has now concluded. The defendants were all initially charged with conspiracy to defraud various financial institutions by the use of fraudulent mortgage applications. A recent assessment places the financial loss to the institutions in excess of £300 […]

Kangs Solicitors are due to start a trial today in relation to a Trading Standards prosecution against the Directors and employees of a Midlands based Company for allegations under the Consumer Protection for Unfair Trading Regulations. Kangs Solicitors have instructed John Jones QC of Carmelite Chambers to represent one company director and James Tilbury of […]

Kangs Solicitors represent one of 5 defendants charged with conspiracy to cheat the Revenue, conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to commit false accounting in relation to tax relief for the British Film Industry running to many millions of pounds. The trial has a time estimate of 6 months. Kangs Solicitors have instructed Mr Thomas Price […]

This was an investigation conducted by HMRC into offences committed by self-employed agents of a national window installations company, whose turnover was £124 million. Our client, who held a high level management position in the company, was alleged to have committed offences of Fraudulent Evasion of Income Tax, National Insurance Contributions and VAT. HMRC investigated […]

Kangs Solicitors represented two defendants at court who were charged as follows ES and MK jointly charged with production of a controlled drug and possessing criminal property MK alone charged with possession of a firearm and possession of ammunition. The prosecution case against the defendants was that MK was producing cannabis on a commercial basis […]