02/08/19
Client Overjoyed | Not Guilty Verdict | Kangs Motoring Offences Defence Solicitors
Share
Kangs Solicitors has successfully defended a client charged with being drunk in charge of a motor vehicle.
Sukhdip Randhawa of Kangs Solicitors explains the circumstances.
The Circumstances | Kangs Motoring Law Defence Solicitors
- At 3:30 am one morning, when our client was asleep in his car, which was parked in a manner which a member of the public had reported to the police as being dangerous, he was awakened by a police officer.
- The keys were in the ignition and our client appeared drunk to the police officer.
- Our client provided a roadside breath test at 4.06am which showed 53 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath.
- Our client was arrested and conveyed to the Police Station. Subsequent breath tests on the Lion Intoxilyzer revealed 44 and 42 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath respectively.
- Our client was interviewed without a solicitor being present, charged and granted bail.
How We Assisted Our Client | Kangs Driving Offences Defence Solicitors
- Our client instructed us that he had consumed three bottles of Budweiser the previous evening, there had been family arguments into the early hours of the morning and he left home with the intention of going to a local hotel for the night to allow ‘the air to settle’.
- Whilst driving to a hotel, our client realised that he had left his wallet at home, so he parked up, drank one further can of high strength lager, smoked a cigarette and then fell asleep.
- In due course, the Prosecution indicated that the charge may be substituted with one of driving with excess alcohol.
- Whilst examining the Prosecution evidence, it was discovered that no caution had been administered to our client at the beginning of the interview and, accordingly, the Prosecution was put on notice that an application would be made to exclude the interview evidence under Section 78 of the Police & Criminal Evidence Act 1984 on the basis that the fairness of the proceedings would otherwise be prejudiced.
The Hearing | Kangs Road Traffic Offence Defence Solicitors
- On the day of the Hearing, the Prosecution confirmed that the existing charge would not be replaced with a new charge of driving with excess alcohol and the interview evidence would not be used.
- The onus then fell upon our client to show that, on a balance of probabilities, there was no likelihood of him driving his motor vehicle whilst still over the prescribed limit and he maintained this stance whilst giving evidence.
- It was emphasised to the court that our client’s alcohol level was receding dramatically and that had he not been woken up by the police officer he would have stayed asleep for several hours, at which time he would have been within the permitted alcohol levels enabling him to drive home legally.
The Successful Outcome | Kangs Magistrates’Court Trial Solicitors
- The Magistrates retired for a short period of time before returning a ‘Not Guilty’ verdict.
- Our client was very complimentary about the manner in which his defence had been conducted, leading to such a successful result.
- Had our client been found guilty it was almost inevitable that he would have lost his job with the obvious detrimental consequences upon his life.
How Can We Help? | Kangs Motoring Law Solicitors
The team at Kangs Solicitors has proven success in defending motoring cases throughout the country and often for high profile clients.
- Kangs Represent Former England Cricket Captain | Andrew Flintoff
- Success in Defending Former Premiership Footballer | Motoring Offences
Who Can I Contact for Help? | Kangs Solicitors for Driving Offences
Please feel free to contact our team through any of the following:
Suki Randhawa
srandhawa@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07989 521210
Helen Holder
hholder@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 07989 521210
New Sentencing Guidelines (‘the New Guidelines’), which come into effect on 1st January 2020, have been issued covering adults convicted of Public Order Offences. John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments upon the changes. Background | Kangs Sentencing Advisory Team In August 2008, the Sentencing Guidelines Council published Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines in respect of such […]
01/11/19
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP. What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s […]
31/10/19
A cut-throat defence arises where, during criminal proceedings, a defendant gives evidence on his own behalf and which is not only likely to strengthen the prosecution case but is designed to damage a co-defendant’s case to the extent that it may go as far as blaming the co-defendant whilst endeavouring to exonerate himself. John Veale […]
30/10/19
