Call us 0333 370 4333
23/11/16

Fitness Issues Affecting the Trial Process | Kangs Solicitors

Share

Amandeep Murria of Kangs Solicitors explores the issues surrounding fitness to plead and fitness to stand trial.

There must be careful consideration when deciding on whether a client is fit to plead and also, more importantly, fit to stand trial.

The opinion of two medical practitioners is usually required and who will, as the result of their assessment, conclude whether or not a client is suffering from a disability.

If it is established a disability exists, consideration must be given as to whether or not the disability is such that it would prejudice the conduct of a fair trial.

The decision regarding the client’s fitness to plead and to stand trial is usually made by the Trial Judge in the Crown Court and if he decides the client is fit, a trial then takes place in the normal way.

A Trial of the Facts | Kangs Criminal Defence Solicitors

However, if the Trial Judge concludes the client is unfit to stand trial, then a Trial of the Facts takes place.

In these circumstances, all of the evidence is presented to a jury in the usual manner and it is simply faced with the task of determining if the client “did the act or made the omission”, without any consideration as to whether the client is actually guilty or not and the mental aspect (the mens rea) of the offence is not taken into account.

Should a Jury conclude the facts have been proven and that the client did the act or made the omission, the Court has several disposals available to it by way of:

  • an absolute discharge,
  • a supervision order or
  • a hospital order.

When Should the Issue of Fitness be Raised?

The issue of fitness is often raised by the Defence and should be identified as soon as possible.

It is, therefore, essential that all material and other relevant indicators are considered during the start of the proceedings and reviewed throughout to life of the proceedings.

There are times when a client may be unfit from the outset but during the proceedings, following treatment,  may subsequently become fit to plead and fit to stand trial.

The issue of fitness is not just for the Defence to raise but can also can be raised by the Prosecution.

Fitness to plead and fitness to stand trial is not always because a client suffers from a Mental Health illness. Other disabilities can render a client from entering a plea or standing trial.

Should medical opinion be required, some of the following questions are addressed during the assessment process:

  • Does the client have the ability to instruct Counsel/ Legal Team and provide instructions?
  • Is the client able to understand the case against them?
  • Is the client able to present their defence?
  • Is the client able to give evidence?

The Legal Framework | Crime Solicitors

In the Crown Court, there is a statutory framework in place which is followed when fitness becomes an issue.

However, this framework does not exist when the case is dealt with in the Magistrates’ Court but guidance is provided and followed in established case law.

The disposals available to the Magistrates’ Court are similar to those available at the Crown Court.

Specialist Lawyers To Help You | Kangs Solicitors

We have specialist lawyers with in-depth knowledge and the experience to establish immediately if there are issues concerning fitness to plead and fitness to stand trial.

If you require advice on all areas of General and Complex Crime, then please do not hesitate to contact us through the following:

Amandeep Murria
amurria@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Helen Holder
hholder@kangssolcitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

New Sentencing Guidelines (‘the New Guidelines’), which come into effect on 1st January 2020, have been issued covering adults convicted of Public Order Offences. John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments upon the changes. Background | Kangs Sentencing Advisory Team In August 2008, the Sentencing Guidelines Council published Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines in respect of such […]
01/11/19
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP. What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s […]
31/10/19
A cut-throat defence arises where, during criminal proceedings, a defendant gives evidence on his own behalf and which is not only likely to strengthen the prosecution case but is designed to damage a co-defendant’s case to the extent that it may go as far as blaming the co-defendant whilst endeavouring to exonerate himself. John Veale […]
30/10/19

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham