Call us 0333 370 4333
24/05/17

Freezing Orders | Kangs Financial Fraud Solicitors

Share

Asset freezing, by way of a court order, is designed to prevent an alleged fraudster from dissipating assets with a view to defeating any subsequent court order which may permanently deprive that person of those assets.

Frequently, in both criminal and civil courts, authorities will obtain, invariably without notice to the alleged offending party, a court order freezing all of the assets of that party (‘ a Freezing Order’), thereby immediately preventing their sale or disposal in any fashion.

Kangs Solicitors have a wealth of experience in advising on and supporting clients who are served with a Freezing Order.

The Nature of A Freezing Order | Kangs Advisory Solicitors

Civil Courts

Appearing in civil law in 1975, Mareva Injunctions, as they were originally known, have developed into what is now the customary form of the Mareva Injunction, a Freezing Order.

In addition to being made against the potential defendant, a Freezing Order can also be made against a third party, such as a bank or trustee, holding assets on behalf of that person.

However, Mareva Injunctions were never intended to change English laws of insolvency and they do not prevent a defendant from repaying legitimate business debts from frozen assets, although an application will need to be made to the court seeking an order authorising any such payment.

Criminal Courts

With a view to preserving assets pending anticipated criminal proceedings, prosecutors and regulators, in anticipation of successfully securing a conviction and an Order for Confiscation Proceedings, will seek a Restraint Order which is, effectively, another form of Freezing Order.

Requirements For The Grant Of A Freezing Order

These orders are not granted lightly and the court will exercise its discretion to grant a Freezing Order only where it considers it just and convenient to do so (section 37(1), SCA 1981).

In addition, case law has established the following conditions for a Freezing Order:

  • The applicant must have a cause of action, that is, an underlying legal or equitable right.
  • The applicant must have a good arguable case.
  • The existence of assets within the jurisdiction.
  • A real risk of the respondent's assets being dissipated

However, it is not unusual for a recipient of a Freezing Order to oppose the need for both its issue and requirements.

Immediate Effects Of A Freezing Order | Kangs Complex Fraud Team

Receipt of a Freezing Order by an individual or a business of any nature can have immediate serious consequences given:  

  • that banks and other financial institutions can be prevented from making any payments other than by further court order,
  • the level of expenditure allowed to a defendant and
  • the purpose of such expenditure will almost certainly be regulated by the authorities,
  • the effects of a Freezing Order are immediate, and prompt attention is required to respond to demands that will be contained within a Freezing Order,
  • the amount of time which will need to be devoted to deal with the requirements of the Freezing Order.

Failure to comply with the requirements of a Freezing Order can be extremely serious.

Steps can be taken to:

  • oppose any unreasonable restrictions imposed
  • obtain authority for payment of legitimate debts
  • increase the level of expenditure allowed.

How Can We Assist You? | Kangs Criminal Solicitors

Dealing effectively with a Freezing Order requires considerable expertise, especially at a time when the recipient is, invariably, distressed and concerned, and expert guidance is essential.

We can advise and represent you by:

  • advising on the contents and requirements of a Freezing Order
  • assisting in the preparation of any affidavit or other document required
  • negotiating any variation of any unreasonable terms
  • considering any possible grounds for discharge of the order
  • guiding generally throughout the process.

Who Can I Contact For Help? | Kangs Freezing Order Solicitors

Our team of solicitors can be contacted through any of the following:

Hamraj Kang
hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
jveale@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 07779 055907

Tim Thompson
tthompson@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 07989 521210

New Sentencing Guidelines (‘the New Guidelines’), which come into effect on 1st January 2020, have been issued covering adults convicted of Public Order Offences. John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments upon the changes. Background | Kangs Sentencing Advisory Team In August 2008, the Sentencing Guidelines Council published Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines in respect of such […]
01/11/19
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP. What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s […]
31/10/19
A cut-throat defence arises where, during criminal proceedings, a defendant gives evidence on his own behalf and which is not only likely to strengthen the prosecution case but is designed to damage a co-defendant’s case to the extent that it may go as far as blaming the co-defendant whilst endeavouring to exonerate himself. John Veale […]
30/10/19

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham