Call us0333 370 4333
25/04/17

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002(POCA) | Assets & Confiscation Orders

Share

Historically

By virtue of Part 2 of POCA, a Confiscation Order is made against a Defendant for a particular amount. It is not made against any particular asset held by the Defendant, though the Court has to take into account property held by the Defendant, when determining the available amount for confiscation purposes, where that amount is less than the benefit derived by the Defendant from his offending.

At the enforcement stage of the Confiscation Order, a third party who claims any interest in property against which the Confiscation Order is to be enforced, can make representations as to their own interest in that property and call evidence to support their claim.

 

The Change

Section 1 of the Serious Crime Act 2015, inserted as new Section 10A into POCA allows the Court, when making a Confiscation Order, to consider, at that point, whether there is property held by the Defendant available to be realised or otherwise used to satisfy the Confiscation Order, and whether any person, other than the Defendant, holds, or may hold, an interest in such property.

The Court may, if it thinks it appropriate to do so, determine the extent, at the time that the Confiscation Order is made, of the Defendant’s interest in the property.

 

What is the Effect of this Change?

The effect of the change introduced by Section 10A is, therefore, to extend the power of the Court whereby it is enabled to bring forward the process of determining the proportion of the Defendant’s interest in any given property at the time of issue of the Confiscation Order rather than, as before, leaving the matter for deliberation at the enforcement stage.

Leaving determination of a third party interest until the enforcement stage of a Confiscation Order can lead to complications, lengthening of proceedings or attempts to frustrate the confiscation process.

The new procedure is aimed at ensuring that criminal assets cannot be hidden with spouses, associates or other third parties.

 

How can Kangs Solicitors help you?

POCA proceedings are extremely complex matters, the defence of which requires patience, attention to detail, considerable analytical skills and a great deal of experience.

We regularly conduct such cases and below are a sample of recent cases conducted by our highly experienced team.

 

Sample Of Recent Cases

Who Can I Contact For Help?

If you are a third party, who is involved in confiscation proceedings, we are here to assist you, manage your contact with the prosecuting authorities and advise you on any confiscation proceedings or other financial issues for which you may face.

Our team of Solicitors has a proven track record of assisting many individuals achieve the best possible result with all manner of financial investigations and can be contacted through any one of the following:

Hamraj Kang
hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
jveale@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Tim Thompson
tthompson@kangssolicitors.co.uk
020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

New Sentencing Guidelines (‘the New Guidelines’), which come into effect on 1st January 2020, have been issued covering adults convicted of Public Order Offences. John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments upon the changes. Background | Kangs Sentencing Advisory Team In August 2008, the Sentencing Guidelines Council published Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines in respect of such […]
01/11/19
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP. What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s […]
31/10/19
A cut-throat defence arises where, during criminal proceedings, a defendant gives evidence on his own behalf and which is not only likely to strengthen the prosecution case but is designed to damage a co-defendant’s case to the extent that it may go as far as blaming the co-defendant whilst endeavouring to exonerate himself. John Veale […]
30/10/19

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham