Call us 0333 370 4333
03/05/17

Successful Confiscation Order Reduction | Kangs POCA Team Background

Share

Our client was convicted at Southwark Crown Court in 2014 following his involvement in a film tax credit fraud.

Confiscation proceedings were initiated under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) in an attempt to recover the illegal profits generated through the crime.

A Confiscation Order was made against our client whose only available asset was a property in London which he sold in expectation that he would be able to satisfy his debt.

Upon completion of the sale the proceeds were insufficient to satisfy the Confiscation Order and our client faced the prospect of serving a default term of imprisonment for non-payment of the full amount due.

Kangs POCA team successfully made an application pursuant to section 23 POCA. The Court reduced the amount payable under the Confiscation Order to reflect the shortfall following the sale of the property.

Confiscation Order Reductions | Kangs POCA Specialists

On the 15th July 2010 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of R v Ward [2010] EWCA Crim 1932. This case was of great importance to applications to vary Confiscation Orders in the Crown Court pursuant to section 23 of POCA.

Where a defendant makes an application to the Crown Court for a variation of a Confiscation Order the Court must calculate the “available amount” as defined in section 9 of POCA.

However, during this process, the Court must calculate this figure from the date on which the application is heard and not look back to the date when the Order was made.

If, following that calculation, the Court finds that the available amount is inadequate to pay the Confiscation Order then the Court may vary the Order by reducing the amount owed.

How Can We Help? | Kangs Financial Fraud Solicitors

Kangs Solicitors are able to offer a wealth of experience in dealing with confiscation proceedings, enforcement proceedings, civil recovery proceedings, cash seizures and restraint orders.

If you are facing confiscation proceedings or if a Confiscation Order has been made against you but you think your assets have been overvalued please contact us.

Who Do I Need To Contact For Assistance? | Kangs Fraud Team

Please do not hesitate to contact one of the following for an initial consultation:

Hamraj Kang
hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258 171 | 020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
jveale@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07779 055907 | 0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Tim Thompson
tthompson@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07710 67 77 67

New Sentencing Guidelines (‘the New Guidelines’), which come into effect on 1st January 2020, have been issued covering adults convicted of Public Order Offences. John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments upon the changes. Background | Kangs Sentencing Advisory Team In August 2008, the Sentencing Guidelines Council published Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines in respect of such […]
01/11/19
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP. What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s […]
31/10/19
A cut-throat defence arises where, during criminal proceedings, a defendant gives evidence on his own behalf and which is not only likely to strengthen the prosecution case but is designed to damage a co-defendant’s case to the extent that it may go as far as blaming the co-defendant whilst endeavouring to exonerate himself. John Veale […]
30/10/19

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham