Call us0333 370 4333
08/11/16

VAT Fraud | Director Disqualification | Kangs Solicitors

Share

Last month, it was reported by the Insolvency Service that Mark Cook (‘Mr Cook) ,a Director of Crouch Commodities Ltd (‘Crouch Commodities’),  had been disqualified from acting as a director of any company for a period of fifteen years.

This penalty arose from the fraudulent evasion of VAT by Crouch Commodities.

Timothy Thompson of Kangs Solicitors briefly examines the case.

The Insolvency Service | Director Disqualification Proceedings | Kangs Solicitors

The Insolvency Service exercises its enforcement powers to investigate  any company which defrauds  the public purse and creditors generally and to disqualify any director(s) found to be culpable.

Crouch Commodities | Kangs VAT Fraud Team

Crouch Commodities,  through Mr Cook, had been involved in Missing Trader Fraud, otherwise known as a Carousel Fraud, in circumstances where Mr Cook  either ‘knew or should have known about’ the fraud that was being perpetrated.

The Public Interest Unit of the Insolvency Service uncovered the fact that Mr Cook, through Crouch Commodities,  had illegally claimed VAT  repayments amounting to approximately nineteen million pounds from the Revenue.

Crouch Commodities traded in wholesale mobile phones, a market known to be rife with VAT fraud and, even if Mr Cook was not aware of this, he ought to have been.

There is a legal requirement to conduct due diligence by processing one or more of a series of checks designed to indicate whether or not a fraud is being perpetrated.

However, ‘the ultimate question is not whether the ‘trader’ exercised due diligence but rather whether he should have known that the only reasonable explanation for the circumstances in which his transaction took place was that it was connected to fraudulent evasion of VAT’.

It should have been clear to Mr Cook that hallmarks of VAT fraud were evident.

Accordingly, the failure to take adequate precautionary steps to reduce risks of involvement in transactions connected with VAT fraud, resulted in the Company submitting fraudulent VAT returns resulting in significant loss to HM Revenue & Customs.

As stated above, Mr Cook was disqualified from acting as a director of any company for fifteen years.

VAT Fraud | Insolvency | Kangs Insolvency Team

Kangs team of Insolvency Solicitors can provide you with the necessary advice and guidance in relation to all aspects of fraud and insolvency problems.

Director Disqualification Solicitors

Tax and Serious Fraud Solicitors

Who Can I Contact For Help? | Kangs Solicitors

You can rest assured in the knowledge that our lawyers can protect you in proceedings that have a tendency to cross-over from civil to criminal proceedings.

Please feel free to contact any of the below lawyers who will be happy to provide you with some initial advice and an informal chat about any of the issues in this article which  may be of interest to you.

Hamraj Kang
hkang@kangssolicitors.co.uk
07976 258171020 7936 6396 | 0121 449 9888

John Veale
jveale@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396

Tim Thompson
tthompson@kangssolicitors.co.uk
0121 449 9888 | 020 7936 6396 | 07710 67 77 67

 

New Sentencing Guidelines (‘the New Guidelines’), which come into effect on 1st January 2020, have been issued covering adults convicted of Public Order Offences. John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments upon the changes. Background | Kangs Sentencing Advisory Team In August 2008, the Sentencing Guidelines Council published Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines in respect of such […]
01/11/19
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP. What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s […]
31/10/19
A cut-throat defence arises where, during criminal proceedings, a defendant gives evidence on his own behalf and which is not only likely to strengthen the prosecution case but is designed to damage a co-defendant’s case to the extent that it may go as far as blaming the co-defendant whilst endeavouring to exonerate himself. John Veale […]
30/10/19

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham